Acacia Research vs InterDigital
ACTG and IDCC side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ACTG and IDCC compare
InterDigital is the larger company, worth 19 times as much as Acacia Research ($7.6B against $406M).
Acacia Research grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−3.7% versus −12.0% for InterDigital).
InterDigital keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 38.5% compared with −6.5% at Acacia Research.
InterDigital pays a dividend yielding 0.96%; Acacia Research does not pay one.
InterDigital scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 5 for Acacia Research), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ACTG | IDCC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $406M | $7.6B |
| Share price | $4.16 | $295.41 |
| Change, 1 year | 12.1% | −20.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −22.1% | 311% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.79 | 0.90 |
| Employees | 986 | 460 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 18 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 32.5× |
| P/S | 1.5× (better) | 9.3× |
| P/B | 0.8× (better) | 6.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.5× (better) | 15.2× |
| P/FCF | – | 24.7× |
| PEG | – | 0.57 |
| FCF yield | – | 4.1% |
| Fair value | $3.98 | $191.90 |
| Margin of safety | −4.6% (better) | −53.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −3.7% (better) | −12.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 57.1% (better) | 18.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −469% | −36.6% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −460% | −38.7% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −31.7% | 52.3% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 23.2% | – |
| Operating margin | −6.0% | 45.1% (better) |
| Net margin | −6.5% | 38.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | – | 37.8% |
| Return on equity | −3.4% | 26.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −6.0% | 83.8% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.03 (better) | 0.25 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −20.61 | −1.82 |
| Interest coverage | −2.2× | 9.9× (better) |
| Current ratio | 5.64 (better) | 1.90 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.58 | 7.82 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 9 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.96% |
| Payout ratio | – | 22.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 3 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 13.2% |
| Buyback yield | – | 1.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 2.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 88.2% | 106% |
| Held by insiders | 63.9% | 2.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$458K (better) | −$26.2M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.5% | 10.6% |
Go deeper
- ACTG stock overview
- ACTG income statement
- ACTG valuation and score
- IDCC stock overview
- IDCC income statement
- IDCC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.