Axcelis Technologies vs Azenta
ACLS and AZTA side by side, both in special industry machinery, except metalworking. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ACLS and AZTA compare
Axcelis Technologies is the larger company, worth 1.6 times as much as Azenta ($3.4B against $2.1B).
Azenta grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (4.9% versus 4.3% for Axcelis Technologies).
Axcelis Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.7% compared with −20.0% at Azenta.
Azenta scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 6 for Axcelis Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ACLS | AZTA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.4B | $2.1B |
| Share price | $111.17 | $48.90 |
| Change, 1 year | 27.2% | 61.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 77.7% | −59.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.74 | 1.33 |
| Employees | 1,465 | 3,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 8 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 33.1× | – |
| P/S | 3.9× | 3.5× (better) |
| P/B | 3.1× | 1.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 27.0× | – |
| P/FCF | 57.3× (better) | 217× |
| FCF yield | 1.7% (better) | 0.46% |
| Fair value | $75.82 | $56.23 |
| Margin of safety | −46.6% | 13.0% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.3% | 4.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 12.1% (better) | 8.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −23.1% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −20.6% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 21.1% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 42.8% | 44.0% (better) |
| Operating margin | 10.3% (better) | −28.6% |
| Net margin | 11.7% (better) | −20.0% |
| FCF margin | 6.7% (better) | 1.6% |
| Return on equity | 9.8% (better) | −7.7% |
| Return on invested capital | 14.2% (better) | −13.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | 15.7× | – |
| Current ratio | 4.43 (better) | 2.50 |
| Altman Z-score | 7.70 (better) | 4.72 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 101% | 115% |
| Held by insiders | 1.5% | 12.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$6.4M | $172K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.4% | 14.1% |
Go deeper
- ACLS stock overview
- ACLS income statement
- ACLS valuation and score
- AZTA stock overview
- AZTA income statement
- AZTA valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.