Accel Entertainment vs Rush Street Interactive
ACEL and RSI side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ACEL and RSI compare
Rush Street Interactive is the larger company, worth 2.5 times as much as Accel Entertainment ($2.7B against $1.1B).
On earnings, Accel Entertainment is cheaper: it trades at 17.8× trailing earnings, against 39.5× for Rush Street Interactive.
Rush Street Interactive grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (38.7% versus 9.0% for Accel Entertainment).
Accel Entertainment keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.5% compared with 2.6% at Rush Street Interactive.
Rush Street Interactive scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 15 for Accel Entertainment), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ACEL | RSI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.1B | $2.7B |
| Share price | $13.55 | $11.86 |
| Change, 1 year | 31.4% | −31.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 10.5% | −43.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.62 | 1.60 |
| Employees | 1,600 | 912 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 4 | 4 |
| Health score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 17.8× (better) | 39.5× |
| P/S | 0.8× (better) | 1.9× |
| P/B | 3.6× (better) | 14.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.9× (better) | 12.3× |
| P/FCF | 10.4× (better) | 13.0× |
| FCF yield | 9.6% (better) | 7.7% |
| Fair value | $18.58 | $12.71 |
| Margin of safety | 27.1% (better) | 6.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 9.0% | 38.7% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 33.3% (better) | 32.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 46.3% (better) | 25.3% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 49.0% (better) | 20.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 99.8% (better) | 35.5% |
| Operating margin | 8.3% | 10.9% (better) |
| Net margin | 4.5% (better) | 2.6% |
| FCF margin | 7.4% | 14.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | 22.3% | 23.0% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 15.1% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.86 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.57 | – |
| Current ratio | 2.27 (better) | 2.22 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.92 | 6.18 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 3.7% (better) | 0.49% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.7% (better) | 0.49% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 55.6% | 54.7% |
| Held by insiders | 8.5% | 54.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$14.8M (better) | −$361M |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.4% | 8.2% |
Go deeper
- ACEL stock overview
- ACEL income statement
- ACEL valuation and score
- RSI stock overview
- RSI income statement
- RSI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.