Accel Entertainment vs Atlanta Braves
ACEL and BATRA side by side, both in amusement and recreation services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ACEL and BATRA compare
Atlanta Braves is the larger company, worth 3.3 times as much as Accel Entertainment ($3.6B against $1.1B).
Accel Entertainment grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.0% versus 5.5% for Atlanta Braves).
Accel Entertainment keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.5% compared with −11.1% at Atlanta Braves.
Accel Entertainment scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 1 for Atlanta Braves), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ACEL | BATRA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.1B | $3.6B |
| Share price | $13.55 | $56.66 |
| Change, 1 year | 31.4% | 33.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 10.5% | 85.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.62 | 0.48 |
| Employees | 1,600 | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 17.8× | – |
| P/S | 0.8× (better) | 4.8× |
| P/B | 3.6× (better) | 6.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.9× | – |
| P/FCF | 10.4× | – |
| FCF yield | 9.6% | – |
| Fair value | $18.58 | $34.30 |
| Margin of safety | 27.1% (better) | −65.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 9.0% (better) | 5.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 33.3% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 46.3% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 49.0% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 99.8% | – |
| Operating margin | 8.3% (better) | −13.2% |
| Net margin | 4.5% (better) | −11.1% |
| FCF margin | 7.4% | – |
| Return on equity | 22.3% (better) | −15.4% |
| Return on invested capital | 15.1% (better) | −6.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.86 | 1.51 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.57 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | −2.1× |
| Current ratio | 2.27 (better) | 0.52 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.92 (better) | 1.39 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 3.7% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 3.7% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 55.6% | 83.2% |
| Held by insiders | 8.5% | 6.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$14.8M (better) | −$30.1M |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.4% | – |
Go deeper
- ACEL stock overview
- ACEL income statement
- ACEL valuation and score
- BATRA stock overview
- BATRA income statement
- BATRA valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.