ProFrac vs North American Construction
ACDC and NOA side by side, both in oil and gas field services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ACDC and NOA compare
North American Construction grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.2% versus −3.3% for ProFrac).
North American Construction keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.6% compared with −20.4% at ProFrac.
North American Construction scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 3 for ProFrac), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ACDC | NOA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $625M | – |
| Share price | $3.43 | $9.46 |
| Change, 1 year | −14.6% | −30.8% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −36.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.27 | 0.90 |
| Employees | 2,280 | 900 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.3× | – |
| P/B | 1.2× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.2× | – |
| FCF yield | −2.5% | – |
| Fair value | $5.41 | – |
| Margin of safety | 36.6% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −3.3% | 10.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 28.8% (better) | 20.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −23.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −24.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −6.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 21.8% (better) | 12.6% |
| Operating margin | −11.8% | 8.5% (better) |
| Net margin | −20.4% | 2.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | −0.84% (better) | −1.3% |
| Return on equity | −56.5% | 8.0% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −10.5% | 5.5% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 2.03 | 1.99 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.78 (better) | 7.42 |
| Interest coverage | −1.7× | 1.9× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.90 (better) | 0.88 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.16 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Payout ratio | – | 39.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 4 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 24.6% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 17.7% | 56.8% |
| Held by insiders | – | 0.00% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $9.8M | – |
Go deeper
- ACDC stock overview
- ACDC income statement
- ACDC valuation and score
- NOA stock overview
- NOA income statement
- NOA valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.