ACCESS Newswire vs RTB Digital
ACCS and RTB side by side, both in management and public relations services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ACCS and RTB compare
RTB Digital is the larger company, worth 6.1 times as much as ACCESS Newswire ($78.2M against $12.8M).
RTB Digital grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (18.7% versus −1.7% for ACCESS Newswire).
ACCESS Newswire keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −7.9% compared with −198% at RTB Digital.
ACCESS Newswire scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 4 for RTB Digital), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ACCS | RTB |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $12.8M | $78.2M |
| Share price | $3.35 | $5.58 |
| Change, 1 year | −62.4% | −46.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −88.9% | −99.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.42 | 3.00 |
| Employees | 25 | 15 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.6× (better) | 7.5× |
| P/B | 0.4× (better) | 2.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.9× | – |
| P/FCF | 7.3× | – |
| FCF yield | 13.6% (better) | −35.4% |
| Fair value | $6.54 | $4.64 |
| Margin of safety | 48.8% (better) | −20.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −1.7% | 18.7% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.1% | 5.5% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 14.7% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 75.1% (better) | 45.1% |
| Operating margin | −8.7% (better) | −167% |
| Net margin | −7.9% (better) | −198% |
| FCF margin | 7.9% (better) | −265% |
| Return on equity | −5.9% (better) | −142% |
| Return on invested capital | −5.2% (better) | −94.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.07 | 0.02 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −1.27 | – |
| Interest coverage | −15.2× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.82 | 1.37 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.27 | 1.56 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 7.3% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 7.3% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 33.3% | 5.2% |
| Held by insiders | 26.4% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $412K (better) | $288K |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.27% | – |
Go deeper
- ACCS stock overview
- ACCS income statement
- ACCS valuation and score
- RTB stock overview
- RTB income statement
- RTB valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.