Acco vs Roma Green Finance
ACCL and ROMA side by side, both in management and public relations services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ACCL and ROMA compare
Acco grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.8% versus −22.2% for Roma Green Finance).
Acco keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.6% compared with −288% at Roma Green Finance.
Acco scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 5 for Roma Green Finance), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ACCL | ROMA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $2.38 | $6.61 |
| Change, 1 year | −44.0% | 136% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −24.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.47 | 0.54 |
| Employees | 22 | 17 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.8% (better) | −22.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −72.0% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −74.7% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 42.7% (better) | 17.1% |
| Operating margin | 4.5% (better) | −315% |
| Net margin | 5.6% (better) | −288% |
| FCF margin | 10.6% (better) | −209% |
| Return on equity | 7.0% (better) | −44.2% |
| Return on invested capital | 515% (better) | −49.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 4.21 | 22.34 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by insiders | 78.9% | 10.2% |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.48% | – |
Go deeper
- ACCL stock overview
- ACCL income statement
- ACCL valuation and score
- ROMA stock overview
- ROMA income statement
- ROMA valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.