StockData

Acco vs Greenpro Capital

ACCL and GRNQ side by side, both in management and public relations services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ACCL and GRNQ compare

Greenpro Capital grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.1% versus 5.8% for Acco).

Acco keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.6% compared with −116% at Greenpro Capital.

Acco scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 8 for Greenpro Capital), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricACCLGRNQ
Size and price
Market cap–$13.5M
Share price$2.38$7.44
Change, 1 year−44.0%−59.3%
Change, 5 years–−91.8%
Beta (5Y)0.470.09
Employees2241
StockData Score
Total score9 (better)8
Valuation score01 (better)
Growth score11
Performance score3 (better)1
Health score55
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–4.4×
P/B–0.7×
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)5.8%8.1% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average–−1.7%
Net income growth (TTM)−72.0%–
EPS growth (TTM)−74.7%–
Profitability
Gross margin42.7%52.6% (better)
Operating margin4.5% (better)−110%
Net margin5.6% (better)−116%
FCF margin10.6%–
Return on equity7.0% (better)−29.3%
Return on invested capital515% (better)−44.7%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.00
Interest coverage–−4735.7×
Current ratio4.2115.92 (better)
Altman Z-score–7.16
Piotroski F-score5 (better)2
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions–0.78%
Held by insiders78.9%–
Insider net buying, 12 months–$400K
Short interest, % of float0.48%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.