StockData

Acadia Pharmaceuticals vs Supernus

ACAD and SUPN side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ACAD and SUPN compare

Supernus grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (16.3% versus 14.8% for Acadia Pharmaceuticals).

Supernus keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 32.8% compared with 30.1% at Acadia Pharmaceuticals.

Acadia Pharmaceuticals scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 6 for Supernus), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricACADSUPN
Size and price
Market cap$3.2B–
Share price$18.75$29.72
Change, 1 year−22.3%−1.3%
Change, 5 years−2.1%–
Beta (5Y)0.780.70
Employees798838
StockData Score
Total score17 (better)6
Valuation score5 (better)0
Growth score23 (better)
Performance score4 (better)2
Health score6 (better)1
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E8.9×–
P/S2.7×–
P/B2.3×–
EV/EBITDA18.4×–
P/FCF39.4×–
FCF yield2.5%–
Fair value$31.63–
Margin of safety40.7%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)14.8%16.3% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average19.4%–
Net income growth (TTM)38.7%252% (better)
EPS growth (TTM)35.5%253% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin90.5% (better)85.0%
Operating margin10.2%40.6% (better)
Net margin30.1%32.8% (better)
FCF margin6.8% (better)2.3%
Return on equity31.4%–
Return on invested capital50.8%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00–
Net debt / EBITDA–0.32
Interest coverage–32.8×
Current ratio3.82 (better)0.61
Altman Z-score4.94–
Piotroski F-score6 (better)4
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield−1.5%–
Shareholder yield−1.5%–
Ownership
Held by institutions97.9%104%
Held by insiders27.8%16.4%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$2.5M (better)−$2.5M
Short interest, % of float6.7%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.