Abacus Global Management vs Ridgepost Capital
ABX and RPC side by side, both in services allied with the exchange of securities. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ABX and RPC compare
Ridgepost Capital is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Abacus Global Management ($1.1B against $881M).
On earnings, Ridgepost Capital is cheaper: it trades at 30.7× trailing earnings, against 32.2× for Abacus Global Management.
Abacus Global Management grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (65.3% versus 8.2% for Ridgepost Capital).
Ridgepost Capital keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.8% compared with 10.5% at Abacus Global Management.
Both pay dividends: Abacus Global Management yields 2.2% and Ridgepost Capital 1.6%.
Ridgepost Capital scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 7 for Abacus Global Management), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ABX | RPC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $881M | $1.1B |
| Share price | $9.01 | $9.82 |
| Change, 1 year | 37.6% | −5.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −8.9% | −29.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.31 | 0.99 |
| Employees | 326 | 326 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 9 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 32.2× | 30.7× (better) |
| P/S | 3.3× (better) | 3.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.7× (better) | 13.5× |
| P/FCF | 9.8× (better) | 11.2× |
| FCF yield | 10.2% (better) | 8.9% |
| Fair value | $8.24 | $12.07 |
| Margin of safety | −9.3% | 18.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 65.3% (better) | 8.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 34.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 129% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 129% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −13.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 88.4% | – |
| Operating margin | 31.8% (better) | 27.2% |
| Net margin | 10.5% | 10.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | 33.5% (better) | 29.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.02 | – |
| Interest coverage | 2.2× | 3.1× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.70 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 1.78 (better) | 1.37 |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.2% (better) | 1.6% |
| Payout ratio | – | 48.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 3 |
| Buyback yield | 3.8% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 6.0% (better) | 1.6% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 28.0% | 44.2% |
| Held by insiders | 32.1% | 25.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$6.7M | $1.4M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 5.1% |
Go deeper
- ABX stock overview
- ABX income statement
- ABX valuation and score
- RPC stock overview
- RPC income statement
- RPC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.