StockData

Abacus Global Management vs Maase

ABX and MAAS side by side, both in services allied with the exchange of securities. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ABX and MAAS compare

Abacus Global Management grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (65.3% versus −76.5% for Maase).

Abacus Global Management keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.5% compared with −102% at Maase.

Abacus Global Management pays a dividend yielding 2.3%; Maase does not pay one.

Abacus Global Management scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 3 for Maase), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricABXMAAS
Size and price
Market cap$862M–
Share price$8.81$9.98
Change, 1 year30.5%169%
Change, 5 years−10.9%−97.2%
Beta (5Y)0.310.37
Employees326100
StockData Score
Total score7 (better)3
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score4 (better)1
Performance score00
Health score12 (better)
Dividend score1 (better)0
Valuation
P/E31.5×–
P/S3.2×–
EV/EBITDA11.5×–
P/FCF9.6×–
FCF yield10.4%–
Fair value$8.23–
Margin of safety−7.0%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)65.3% (better)−76.5%
Revenue growth, 5Y average–−0.83%
Profitability
Gross margin88.4% (better)13.7%
Operating margin31.8% (better)−12.9%
Net margin10.5% (better)−102%
FCF margin33.5% (better)−58.2%
Return on equity–−7.1%
Return on invested capital–−0.71%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.01
Net debt / EBITDA3.02–
Interest coverage2.2× (better)−16.9×
Current ratio0.7010.67 (better)
Altman Z-score1.76–
Piotroski F-score33
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield2.3%–
Buyback yield3.8%–
Shareholder yield6.1%–
Ownership
Held by institutions28.0%0.07%
Held by insiders32.1%81.0%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$6.7M–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.