StockData

Arbutus Biopharma vs Xencor

ABUS and XNCR side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ABUS and XNCR compare

Xencor is the larger company, worth 3.9 times as much as Arbutus Biopharma ($3.0B against $768M).

Arbutus Biopharma grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1143% versus 33.5% for Xencor).

Arbutus Biopharma keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 121% compared with −58.8% at Xencor.

Arbutus Biopharma scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 7 for Xencor), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricABUSXNCR
Size and price
Market cap$768M$3.0B
Share price$3.88$39.97
Change, 1 year−15.5%191%
Change, 5 years17.6%8.4%
Beta (5Y)0.551.04
Employees19260
StockData Score
Total score12 (better)7
Valuation score3 (better)0
Growth score12 (better)
Performance score3 (better)2
Health score5 (better)3
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E3.5×–
P/S4.2× (better)14.8×
P/B9.0×5.3× (better)
EV/EBITDA2.9×–
FCF yield–−5.9%
Fair value$21.71$16.78
Margin of safety82.1% (better)−138%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)1143% (better)33.5%
Revenue growth, 5Y average15.3% (better)0.47%
Profitability
Operating margin81.1% (better)−72.7%
Net margin121% (better)−58.8%
FCF margin–−88.0%
Return on equity270% (better)−19.9%
Return on invested capital–−17.4%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.17 (better)
Interest coverage2299× (better)−6.2×
Current ratio1.406.54 (better)
Altman Z-score−0.647.13 (better)
Piotroski F-score4 (better)3
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions71.1%113%
Held by insiders35.9%1.6%
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$3.9M
Short interest, % of float15.7%17.6%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.