StockData

Abits vs DarkHorse Technologies

ABTS and DRK side by side, both in finance services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ABTS and DRK compare

Abits grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (36.0% versus −8.8% for DarkHorse Technologies).

Abits keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −31.4% compared with −334% at DarkHorse Technologies.

DarkHorse Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 8 for Abits), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricABTSDRK
Size and price
Market cap–$15.1M
Share price$0.408$1.74
Change, 1 year−93.4%−71.0%
Change, 5 years−99.5%−99.5%
Beta (5Y)1.591.78
Employees114
StockData Score
Total score810 (better)
Valuation score03 (better)
Growth score2 (better)1
Performance score4 (better)1
Health score25 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–1.5×
P/B–0.8×
FCF yield–−134%
Fair value–$2.34
Margin of safety–25.6%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)36.0% (better)−8.8%
Revenue growth, 5Y average89.8% (better)18.2%
Profitability
Gross margin40.3% (better)7.8%
Operating margin40.3% (better)−335%
Net margin−31.4% (better)−334%
FCF margin−18.5% (better)−200%
Return on equity−33.3% (better)−140%
Return on invested capital33.6% (better)−157%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.18 (better)0.00
Net debt / EBITDA0.32–
Current ratio0.392.56 (better)
Altman Z-score–−29.77
Piotroski F-score5 (better)3
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield–−54.3%
Shareholder yield–−54.3%
Ownership
Held by institutions2.2%4.0%
Held by insiders67.2%33.8%
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$67.9K
Short interest, % of float2.3%1.5%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.