StockData

Absci vs bioAffinity Technologies

ABSI and BIAF side by side, both in engineering, accounting, research, management, and related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ABSI and BIAF compare

Absci is the larger company, worth 565 times as much as bioAffinity Technologies ($1.5B against $2.6M).

bioAffinity Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−18.5% versus −47.2% for Absci).

bioAffinity Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −279% compared with −8451% at Absci.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricABSIBIAF
Size and price
Market cap$1.5B$2.6M
Share price$8.45$2.20
Change, 1 year149%−93.2%
Change, 5 years−23.5%–
Beta (5Y)2.19−1.10
Employees14057
StockData Score
Total score55
Valuation score03 (better)
Growth score00
Performance score00
Health score5 (better)2
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S975×0.5× (better)
P/B6.6×0.7× (better)
FCF yield−7.8% (better)−508%
Fair value–$11.85
Margin of safety–81.4%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−47.2%−18.5% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average−10.1%–
Profitability
Operating margin−8812%−246% (better)
Net margin−8451%−279% (better)
FCF margin−7563%−236% (better)
Return on equity−58.6% (better)−240%
Return on invested capital−242% (better)−694%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.05 (better)
Interest coverage−2569.4×−270.9× (better)
Current ratio9.64 (better)1.51
Altman Z-score36.44 (better)−19.56
Piotroski F-score3 (better)2
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield−7.6%–
Shareholder yield−7.6%0.00% (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions88.3%11.1%
Held by insiders15.5%–
Insider net buying, 12 months$801K–
Short interest, % of float24.7%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.