ABM Industries vs Amentum
ABM and AMTM side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ABM and AMTM compare
Amentum is the larger company, worth 1.7 times as much as ABM Industries ($5.3B against $3.1B).
On earnings, ABM Industries is cheaper: it trades at 19.3× trailing earnings, against 26.3× for Amentum.
Amentum grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (11.4% versus 6.0% for ABM Industries).
ABM Industries keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 1.8% compared with 1.4% at Amentum.
ABM Industries pays a dividend yielding 2.2%; Amentum does not pay one.
ABM Industries scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 7 for Amentum), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ABM | AMTM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.1B | $5.3B |
| Share price | $53.48 | $21.87 |
| Change, 1 year | 24.2% | 1.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 11.4% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.88 | 1.21 |
| Employees | 113K | 50K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 19.3× (better) | 26.3× |
| P/S | 0.3× (better) | 0.4× |
| P/B | 1.8× | 1.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.0× (better) | 14.8× |
| P/FCF | 10.0× (better) | 11.3× |
| FCF yield | 10.0% (better) | 8.9% |
| Fair value | $61.17 | $25.55 |
| Margin of safety | 12.6% | 14.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 6.0% | 11.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.9% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 43.6% | 292% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 49.7% | 113% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 12.0% (better) | 10.2% |
| Operating margin | 3.5% | 4.2% (better) |
| Net margin | 1.8% (better) | 1.4% |
| FCF margin | 3.4% (better) | 3.4% |
| Return on equity | 9.2% (better) | 4.5% |
| Return on invested capital | 7.2% (better) | 5.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.99 | 0.81 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.83 (better) | 5.65 |
| Interest coverage | 3.0× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.42 | 1.52 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.80 (better) | 2.02 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.2% | – |
| Payout ratio | 40.5% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 16 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 7.5% | – |
| Buyback yield | 5.4% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 7.5% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 101% | 89.6% |
| Held by insiders | 1.7% | 32.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$4.4M | – |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.5% | 7.4% |
Go deeper
- ABM stock overview
- ABM income statement
- ABM valuation and score
- AMTM stock overview
- AMTM income statement
- AMTM valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.