Asbury Automotive vs O Reilly Automotive
ABG and ORLY side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ABG and ORLY compare
O Reilly Automotive is the larger company, worth 20 times as much as Asbury Automotive ($71.3B against $3.6B).
On earnings, Asbury Automotive is cheaper: it trades at 7.9× trailing earnings, against 28.1× for O Reilly Automotive.
O Reilly Automotive grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.5% versus −1.3% for Asbury Automotive).
O Reilly Automotive keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 14.3% compared with 2.7% at Asbury Automotive.
O Reilly Automotive scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 9 for Asbury Automotive), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ABG | ORLY |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.6B | $71.3B |
| Share price | $198.03 | $88.12 |
| Change, 1 year | −16.6% | −6.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 8.8% | 107% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.94 | 0.47 |
| Employees | 15K | 93K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 7.9× (better) | 28.1× |
| P/S | 0.2× (better) | 3.8× |
| P/B | 0.9× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.2× (better) | 18.7× |
| P/FCF | – | 33.1× |
| PEG | – | 2.80 |
| FCF yield | – | 3.0% |
| Fair value | $252.95 | $61.78 |
| Margin of safety | 21.7% (better) | −42.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −1.3% | 8.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 20.3% (better) | 8.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −16.6% | 9.4% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −12.3% | 12.5% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 13.8% (better) | 13.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 17.1% | 51.6% (better) |
| Operating margin | 4.2% | 19.6% (better) |
| Net margin | 2.7% | 14.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | – | 11.6% |
| Return on equity | 11.8% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 7.6% | 60.8% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.84 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.91 | 1.62 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 14.4× |
| Current ratio | 0.91 (better) | 0.75 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.49 | 3.54 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 6.8% (better) | 4.7% |
| Shareholder yield | 6.8% (better) | 4.7% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 107% | 88.5% |
| Held by insiders | 18.2% | 0.55% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $1.7M (better) | −$11.7M |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 9.2% | 3.1% |
Go deeper
- ABG stock overview
- ABG income statement
- ABG valuation and score
- ORLY stock overview
- ORLY income statement
- ORLY valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.