Asbury Automotive vs Group 1 Automotive
ABG and GPI side by side, both in retail-auto dealers & gasoline stations. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ABG and GPI compare
Asbury Automotive and Group 1 Automotive are about the same size, with market caps of $3.6B and $3.1B.
On earnings, Asbury Automotive is cheaper: it trades at 7.9× trailing earnings, against 8.3× for Group 1 Automotive.
Asbury Automotive grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−1.3% versus −3.4% for Group 1 Automotive).
Asbury Automotive keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.7% compared with 1.7% at Group 1 Automotive.
Group 1 Automotive pays a dividend yielding 0.82%; Asbury Automotive does not pay one.
Group 1 Automotive scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 9 for Asbury Automotive), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ABG | GPI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.6B | $3.1B |
| Share price | $198.03 | $260.80 |
| Change, 1 year | −16.6% | −35.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 8.8% | 32.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.94 | 0.75 |
| Employees | 15K | 20K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 7.9× (better) | 8.3× |
| P/S | 0.2× | 0.1× (better) |
| P/B | 0.9× (better) | 1.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.2× | 7.8× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 13.7× |
| FCF yield | – | 7.3% |
| Fair value | $252.95 | $286.98 |
| Margin of safety | 21.7% (better) | 9.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −1.3% (better) | −3.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 20.3% (better) | 16.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −16.6% | 0.96% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −12.3% | 10.6% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 13.8% (better) | 10.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 17.1% (better) | 15.9% |
| Operating margin | 4.2% (better) | 3.6% |
| Net margin | 2.7% (better) | 1.7% |
| FCF margin | – | 1.0% |
| Return on equity | 11.8% | 12.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 7.6% | 9.5% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.84 (better) | 1.27 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.91 | 3.82 (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.91 | 1.32 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.49 | 3.24 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.82% |
| Payout ratio | – | 6.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 5 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 27.2% |
| Buyback yield | 6.8% | 12.1% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 6.8% | 13.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 107% | 100% |
| Held by insiders | 18.2% | 18.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $1.7M | $187M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 9.2% | 14.8% |
Go deeper
- ABG stock overview
- ABG income statement
- ABG valuation and score
- GPI stock overview
- GPI income statement
- GPI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.