StockData

Ambev vs Andina Bottling

ABEV and AKO.A side by side, both in beverages. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ABEV and AKO.A compare

Andina Bottling grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3.7% versus −1.4% for Ambev).

Ambev keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 17.6% compared with 8.0% at Andina Bottling.

Ambev scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 7 for Andina Bottling), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricABEVAKO.A
Size and price
Share price$2.76$25.29
Change, 1 year9.1%9.9%
Change, 5 years−9.8%139%
Beta (5Y)0.410.38
Employees40K–
StockData Score
Total score12 (better)7
Valuation score00
Growth score2 (better)1
Performance score6 (better)5
Health score4 (better)1
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−1.4%3.7% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average8.6%14.5% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)7.4%15.5% (better)
EPS growth (TTM)8.3%15.5% (better)
EPS growth, 5Y average6.6%–
Profitability
Gross margin51.4% (better)39.1%
Operating margin26.4%–
Net margin17.6% (better)8.0%
FCF margin22.5% (better)5.5%
Return on equity16.6%25.2% (better)
Return on invested capital25.2%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.04–
Net debt / EBITDA−0.65–
Interest coverage5.3×–
Current ratio0.961.41 (better)
Piotroski F-score67 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Payout ratio–72.9%
Ownership
Held by institutions8.9%0.21%
Held by insiders0.22%0.00%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$2.6M–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.