StockData

Ambev vs Archer-Daniels-Midland

ABEV and ADM side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ABEV and ADM compare

Archer-Daniels-Midland grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−0.82% versus −1.4% for Ambev).

Ambev keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 17.6% compared with 2.2% at Archer-Daniels-Midland.

Archer-Daniels-Midland pays a dividend yielding 2.7%; Ambev does not pay one.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricABEVADM
Size and price
Market cap–$37.1B
Share price$2.66$76.91
Change, 1 year22.0%27.1%
Change, 5 years−17.4%19.3%
Beta (5Y)0.400.40
Employees40K41K
StockData Score
Total score1212
Valuation score01 (better)
Growth score23 (better)
Performance score6 (better)1
Health score4 (better)3
Dividend score04 (better)
Valuation
P/E–21.1×
P/S–0.5×
EV/EBITDA–11.4×
P/FCF–22.1×
FCF yield–4.5%
Fair value–$72.72
Margin of safety–−5.8%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−1.4%−0.82% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average8.6% (better)4.5%
Net income growth (TTM)7.4%61.1% (better)
EPS growth (TTM)8.3%60.1% (better)
EPS growth, 5Y average6.6% (better)−6.7%
Profitability
Gross margin51.4% (better)6.9%
Operating margin26.4%–
Net margin17.6% (better)2.2%
FCF margin22.5% (better)2.0%
Return on equity16.6%–
Return on invested capital25.2%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.04–
Net debt / EBITDA−0.651.79 (better)
Interest coverage5.3×–
Current ratio0.961.39 (better)
Altman Z-score–3.04
Piotroski F-score6 (better)5
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield–2.7%
Payout ratio–56.6%
Years of dividend growth–15
Dividend growth, 5Y average–7.2%
Shareholder yield–2.7%
Ownership
Held by institutions8.9%87.5%
Held by insiders0.22%0.75%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$2.4M (better)−$9.6M
Superinvestors holding–1
Short interest, % of float–2.7%

Go deeper

Other comparisons

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.