StockData

Abeona Therapeutics vs Keros Therapeutics

ABEO and KROS side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ABEO and KROS compare

Keros Therapeutics is the larger company, worth 1.5 times as much as Abeona Therapeutics ($204M against $138M).

Keros Therapeutics keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −153% compared with −160% at Abeona Therapeutics.

Keros Therapeutics scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 8 for Abeona Therapeutics), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricABEOKROS
Size and price
Market cap$138M$204M
Share price$2.42$10.30
Change, 1 year−51.0%−41.0%
Change, 5 years−86.9%−82.8%
Beta (5Y)1.301.11
Employees22678
StockData Score
Total score89 (better)
Valuation score33
Growth score1 (better)0
Performance score2 (better)1
Health score25 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S3.5× (better)5.1×
P/B1.1×0.7× (better)
FCF yield−47.9%−23.6% (better)
Fair value$3.99$24.09
Margin of safety39.4%57.3% (better)
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)–−83.4%
Revenue growth, 5Y average−10.3%–
Net income growth (TTM)−176% (better)−196%
EPS growth (TTM)–−282%
Profitability
Gross margin65.1%–
Operating margin−186%−181% (better)
Net margin−160%−153% (better)
FCF margin−170%−119% (better)
Return on equity−42.1%−12.6% (better)
Return on invested capital–−389%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.09 (better)0.00
Interest coverage−24.5×–
Current ratio5.6918.14 (better)
Altman Z-score−4.842.37 (better)
Piotroski F-score46 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions77.9%101%
Held by insiders12.3%53.3%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$3.5M−$447K (better)
Short interest, % of float33.6%11.7%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.