American Battery Technology vs Energy Fuels
ABAT and UUUU side by side, both in mining & quarrying of nonmetallic minerals (no fuels). Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ABAT and UUUU compare
Energy Fuels is the larger company, worth 10 times as much as American Battery Technology ($1.6B against $161M).
American Battery Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (348% versus 48.9% for Energy Fuels).
Energy Fuels keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −100.0% compared with −345% at American Battery Technology.
American Battery Technology scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 8 for Energy Fuels), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ABAT | UUUU |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $161M | $1.6B |
| Share price | $1.13 | $6.59 |
| Change, 1 year | −74.0% | −58.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −94.3% | −28.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.67 | 1.61 |
| Employees | 195 | 1,069 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 3 | 3 |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 7.2× (better) | 14.1× |
| P/B | 1.4× (better) | 1.7× |
| Fair value | $1.45 | $8.60 |
| Margin of safety | 22.0% | 23.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 348% (better) | 48.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 109% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | −14.3% | 47.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | −353% | −81.0% (better) |
| Net margin | −345% | −100.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | −72.8% | −14.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −90.3% | −10.2% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | −10.2× |
| Current ratio | 8.24 | 20.49 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 10.06 (better) | 1.36 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 36.3% | 72.4% |
| Held by insiders | 3.8% | 1.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$767K (better) | −$1.8M |
| Short interest, % of float | 16.3% | 23.6% |
Go deeper
- ABAT stock overview
- ABAT income statement
- ABAT valuation and score
- UUUU stock overview
- UUUU income statement
- UUUU valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.