StockData

American Battery Technology vs Largo

ABAT and LGO side by side, both in mining & quarrying of nonmetallic minerals (no fuels). Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ABAT and LGO compare

American Battery Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (348% versus −12.0% for Largo).

Largo keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −62.3% compared with −345% at American Battery Technology.

American Battery Technology scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 1 for Largo), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricABATLGO
Size and price
Market cap$161M–
Share price$1.13$0.306
Change, 1 year−74.0%−72.2%
Change, 5 years−94.3%−97.1%
Beta (5Y)1.670.85
Employees195–
StockData Score
Total score11 (better)1
Valuation score3 (better)0
Growth score2 (better)1
Performance score00
Health score6 (better)0
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S7.2×–
P/B1.4×–
Fair value$1.45–
Margin of safety22.0%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)348% (better)−12.0%
Revenue growth, 5Y average–−1.7%
Profitability
Gross margin−14.3%52.2% (better)
Operating margin−353%–
Net margin−345%−62.3% (better)
FCF margin–−34.3%
Return on equity−72.8%−46.4% (better)
Return on invested capital−90.3%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.82 (better)
Current ratio8.24 (better)0.51
Altman Z-score10.06–
Piotroski F-score5 (better)4
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions36.3%18.4%
Held by insiders3.8%45.7%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$767K–
Short interest, % of float16.3%8.5%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.