Allied Gold vs Alamos Gold
AAUC and AGI side by side, both in materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AAUC and AGI compare
Allied Gold grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (82.3% versus 34.3% for Alamos Gold).
Alamos Gold scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 4 for Allied Gold), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AAUC | AGI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $21.67 | $30.00 |
| Change, 1 year | 32.1% | −7.7% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 263% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.81 | 0.68 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 82.3% (better) | 34.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 19.3% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 204% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 41.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 38.0% | 55.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | – | 60.7% |
| Net margin | −3.9% | – |
| FCF margin | 7.9% | 15.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | −13.8% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.38 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.97 | −0.39 |
| Current ratio | 0.77 | 2.00 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 62.4% | 58.1% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.6% | 2.1% |
Go deeper
- AAUC stock overview
- AAUC income statement
- AAUC valuation and score
- AGI stock overview
- AGI income statement
- AGI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.