American Assets Trust vs Saul Centers
AAT and BFS side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AAT and BFS compare
American Assets Trust is the larger company, worth 1.9 times as much as Saul Centers ($1.3B against $719M).
On earnings, Saul Centers is cheaper: it trades at 30.0× trailing earnings, against 75.4× for American Assets Trust.
Saul Centers grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.7% versus −3.9% for American Assets Trust).
Both pay dividends: American Assets Trust yields 6.2% and Saul Centers 8.1%.
Saul Centers scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 9 for American Assets Trust), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AAT | BFS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.3B | $719M |
| Share price | $21.86 | $29.09 |
| Change, 1 year | 15.4% | −2.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −45.5% | −43.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.83 | 0.75 |
| Employees | 232 | 70 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 2 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 75.4× | 30.0× (better) |
| P/S | 3.1× | 2.4× (better) |
| P/B | 1.2× (better) | 2.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.2× | 3.4× (better) |
| PEG | 8.85 | – |
| Fair value | $29.55 | $59.07 |
| Margin of safety | 26.0% | 50.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −3.9% | 8.7% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.8% | 5.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −19.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −78.2% | −26.5% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 14.9% (better) | −2.7% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 60.8% | – |
| Operating margin | 22.8% | 67.0% (better) |
| Net margin | – | 11.5% |
| Return on equity | – | 11.3% |
| Return on invested capital | 7.7% | 52.7% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | 2.6× |
| Altman Z-score | 0.53 (better) | 0.47 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 6.2% | 8.1% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 165% |
| Years of dividend growth | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 6.3% (better) | 2.2% |
| Buyback yield | – | −0.68% |
| Shareholder yield | 6.2% | 7.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 93.4% | 47.6% |
| Held by insiders | 48.9% | 4.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $37.7M (better) | $332K |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.7% | 2.1% |
Go deeper
- AAT stock overview
- AAT income statement
- AAT valuation and score
- BFS stock overview
- BFS income statement
- BFS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.