AAON vs Tennant
AAON and TNC side by side, both in industrial and commercial machinery and computer equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AAON and TNC compare
AAON is the larger company, worth 4.8 times as much as Tennant ($6.3B against $1.3B).
On earnings, AAON is cheaper: it trades at 31.0× trailing earnings, against 75.5× for Tennant.
AAON grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (72.3% versus −2.9% for Tennant).
AAON keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.0% compared with 1.5% at Tennant.
Both pay dividends: AAON yields 0.52% and Tennant 1.6%.
AAON scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 8 for Tennant), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AAON | TNC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $6.3B | $1.3B |
| Share price | $76.33 | $76.25 |
| Change, 1 year | −27.8% | 3.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 47.9% | −7.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.37 | 0.86 |
| Employees | 5,897 | 4,484 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 19 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 31.0× (better) | 75.5× |
| P/S | 2.8× | 1.1× (better) |
| P/B | – | 2.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | 16.9× (better) | 40.7× |
| PEG | 23.39 | – |
| FCF yield | – | −0.21% |
| Fair value | $96.89 | $34.25 |
| Margin of safety | 21.2% (better) | −123% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 72.3% (better) | −2.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 22.9% (better) | 3.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 104% (better) | −69.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 105% (better) | −68.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 5.4% | 5.5% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 25.9% | 38.8% (better) |
| Operating margin | 12.3% (better) | 3.2% |
| Net margin | 9.0% (better) | 1.5% |
| FCF margin | – | −0.22% |
| Return on equity | – | 3.1% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 3.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.67 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 7.25 |
| Current ratio | 2.82 (better) | 2.04 |
| Altman Z-score | 7.10 (better) | 3.04 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.52% | 1.6% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 16.0% | 119% |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | 16 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 9.6% (better) | 6.1% |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | 9.1% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.52% | 10.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 79.0% | 108% |
| Held by insiders | 16.4% | 6.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$22.5M | $882K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 9.2% | 8.4% |
Go deeper
- AAON stock overview
- AAON income statement
- AAON valuation and score
- TNC stock overview
- TNC income statement
- TNC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.