Acadian Asset Management vs BRC
AAMI and RILY side by side, both in services allied with the exchange of securities. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AAMI and RILY compare
Acadian Asset Management is the larger company, worth 22 times as much as BRC ($3.5B against $156M).
On earnings, BRC is cheaper: it trades at 1.0× trailing earnings, against 28.5× for Acadian Asset Management.
Acadian Asset Management grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (27.9% versus 4.0% for BRC).
Acadian Asset Management keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 17.0% compared with 8.8% at BRC.
Acadian Asset Management pays a dividend yielding 0.32%; BRC does not pay one.
BRC scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 7 for Acadian Asset Management), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AAMI | RILY |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.5B | $156M |
| Share price | $97.22 | $3.89 |
| Change, 1 year | 115% | −26.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 220% | −95.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.22 | 1.30 |
| Employees | 396 | 1,380 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 8 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 28.5× | 1.0× (better) |
| P/S | 4.8× | 0.2× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 18.0× | 0.5× (better) |
| Fair value | $56.21 | $33.78 |
| Margin of safety | −73.0% | 88.5% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 27.9% (better) | 4.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.4% | 3.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 38.7% (better) | −64.4% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 43.9% (better) | −46.8% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −8.7% | 5.3% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 85.5% |
| Operating margin | 25.5% (better) | 12.4% |
| Net margin | 17.0% (better) | 8.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | 10.5× (better) | 1.5× |
| Altman Z-score | 4.43 (better) | 0.18 |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.32% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −21.0% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.32% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 101% | 43.1% |
| Held by insiders | 91.7% | 23.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$158M | −$2.6M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 55.4% | – |
Go deeper
- AAMI stock overview
- AAMI income statement
- AAMI valuation and score
- RILY stock overview
- RILY income statement
- RILY valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.