Acadian Asset Management vs GCM Grosvenor
AAMI and GCMG side by side, both in services allied with the exchange of securities. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AAMI and GCMG compare
Acadian Asset Management is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as GCM Grosvenor ($3.5B against $2.9B).
Acadian Asset Management grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (27.9% versus 6.6% for GCM Grosvenor).
Acadian Asset Management keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 17.0% compared with 8.0% at GCM Grosvenor.
Both pay dividends: Acadian Asset Management yields 0.32% and GCM Grosvenor 3.4%.
GCM Grosvenor scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 7 for Acadian Asset Management), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AAMI | GCMG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.5B | $2.9B |
| Share price | $97.22 | $14.20 |
| Change, 1 year | 115% | 21.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 220% | 20.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.22 | 0.89 |
| Employees | 396 | 553 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 1 | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 28.5× | – |
| P/S | 4.8× (better) | 4.9× |
| P/B | – | 87.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | 18.0× | 16.6× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 14.4× |
| FCF yield | – | 6.9% |
| Fair value | $56.21 | $10.76 |
| Margin of safety | −73.0% | −32.0% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 27.9% (better) | 6.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.4% | 5.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 38.7% (better) | 36.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 43.9% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −8.7% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 25.5% | 27.1% (better) |
| Net margin | 17.0% (better) | 8.0% |
| FCF margin | – | 34.4% |
| Return on equity | – | 360% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | 10.5× | – |
| Altman Z-score | 4.43 | 4.48 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.32% | 3.4% (better) |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −21.0% | – |
| Buyback yield | – | 1.7% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.32% | 5.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 101% | 27.2% |
| Held by insiders | 91.7% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$158M | −$10.2M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 55.4% | – |
Go deeper
- AAMI stock overview
- AAMI income statement
- AAMI valuation and score
- GCMG stock overview
- GCMG income statement
- GCMG valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.