Acadian Asset Management vs Artisan Partners Asset Management
AAMI and APAM side by side, both in services allied with the exchange of securities. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AAMI and APAM compare
Acadian Asset Management and Artisan Partners Asset Management are about the same size, with market caps of $3.5B and $3.1B.
On earnings, Artisan Partners Asset Management is cheaper: it trades at 9.1× trailing earnings, against 28.5× for Acadian Asset Management.
Acadian Asset Management grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (27.9% versus 8.7% for Artisan Partners Asset Management).
Artisan Partners Asset Management keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 24.5% compared with 17.0% at Acadian Asset Management.
Both pay dividends: Acadian Asset Management yields 0.32% and Artisan Partners Asset Management 10.5%.
Artisan Partners Asset Management scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 7 for Acadian Asset Management), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AAMI | APAM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.5B | $3.1B |
| Share price | $97.22 | $38.49 |
| Change, 1 year | 115% | −14.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 220% | −21.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.22 | 1.29 |
| Employees | 396 | 567 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 19 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 28.5× | 9.1× (better) |
| P/S | 4.8× | 2.5× (better) |
| P/B | – | 7.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | 18.0× | 6.5× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 9.5× |
| PEG | – | 0.81 |
| FCF yield | – | 10.5% |
| Fair value | $56.21 | $57.34 |
| Margin of safety | −73.0% | 32.9% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 27.9% (better) | 8.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.4% | 5.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 38.7% (better) | 16.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 43.9% (better) | 15.6% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −8.7% | 3.6% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 25.5% | 33.4% (better) |
| Net margin | 17.0% | 24.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | – | 26.0% |
| Return on equity | – | 73.1% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 537% |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | 10.5× | 48.7× (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 4.43 (better) | 3.94 |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.32% | 10.5% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 93.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −21.0% | 1.4% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.32% | 10.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 101% | 85.9% |
| Held by insiders | 91.7% | 11.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$158M | −$298K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 55.4% | 6.1% |
Go deeper
- AAMI stock overview
- AAMI income statement
- AAMI valuation and score
- APAM stock overview
- APAM income statement
- APAM valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.