Acadian Asset Management vs Abacus Global Management
AAMI and ABX side by side, both in services allied with the exchange of securities. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AAMI and ABX compare
Acadian Asset Management is the larger company, worth 3.9 times as much as Abacus Global Management ($3.5B against $881M).
On earnings, Acadian Asset Management is cheaper: it trades at 28.5× trailing earnings, against 32.2× for Abacus Global Management.
Abacus Global Management grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (65.3% versus 27.9% for Acadian Asset Management).
Acadian Asset Management keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 17.0% compared with 10.5% at Abacus Global Management.
Both pay dividends: Acadian Asset Management yields 0.32% and Abacus Global Management 2.2%.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AAMI | ABX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.5B | $881M |
| Share price | $97.22 | $9.01 |
| Change, 1 year | 115% | 37.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 220% | −8.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.22 | 0.31 |
| Employees | 396 | 326 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 7 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 1 | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 28.5× (better) | 32.2× |
| P/S | 4.8× | 3.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 18.0× | 11.7× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 9.8× |
| FCF yield | – | 10.2% |
| Fair value | $56.21 | $8.24 |
| Margin of safety | −73.0% | −9.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 27.9% | 65.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.4% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 38.7% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 43.9% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −8.7% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 88.4% |
| Operating margin | 25.5% | 31.8% (better) |
| Net margin | 17.0% (better) | 10.5% |
| FCF margin | – | 33.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 3.02 |
| Interest coverage | 10.5× (better) | 2.2× |
| Current ratio | – | 0.70 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.43 (better) | 1.78 |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.32% | 2.2% (better) |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −21.0% | – |
| Buyback yield | – | 3.8% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.32% | 6.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 101% | 28.0% |
| Held by insiders | 91.7% | 32.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$158M | −$6.7M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 55.4% | – |
Go deeper
- AAMI stock overview
- AAMI income statement
- AAMI valuation and score
- ABX stock overview
- ABX income statement
- ABX valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.