StockData

ATA Creativity Global vs Jinxin Technology

AACG and NAMI side by side, both in services-educational services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How AACG and NAMI compare

Jinxin Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1.6% versus 0.02% for ATA Creativity Global).

ATA Creativity Global keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −17.9% compared with −22.8% at Jinxin Technology.

Jinxin Technology scores higher on the StockData Score (3 against 0 for ATA Creativity Global), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricAACGNAMI
Size and price
Share price$0.777$1.71
Change, 1 year−38.4%−91.1%
Change, 5 years−56.1%–
Beta (5Y)0.65−0.18
Employees18810K
StockData Score
Total score03 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score01 (better)
Performance score00
Health score02 (better)
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)0.02%1.6% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average10.6%–
Net income growth (TTM)–−565%
EPS growth (TTM)–−275%
Profitability
Gross margin48.6% (better)11.0%
Operating margin−23.9% (better)−25.2%
Net margin−17.9% (better)−22.8%
FCF margin−6.4%−6.1% (better)
Return on equity−86.0% (better)−95.5%
Return on invested capital−1680%−266% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.500.13 (better)
Interest coverage–−3257.9×
Current ratio0.321.50 (better)
Piotroski F-score22
Ownership
Held by institutions0.23%0.00%
Held by insiders–59.2%
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$145K

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.