StockData

Alcoa vs Ternium

AA and TX side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How AA and TX compare

Alcoa grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (11.2% versus −11.6% for Ternium).

Alcoa keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.7% compared with 2.7% at Ternium.

Alcoa pays a dividend yielding 1.0%; Ternium does not pay one.

Alcoa scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 4 for Ternium), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricAATX
Size and price
Market cap$10.3B–
Share price$39.19$52.77
Change, 1 year0.72%47.2%
Change, 5 years−18.1%36.5%
Beta (5Y)1.690.83
Employees15K33K
StockData Score
Total score15 (better)4
Valuation score5 (better)0
Growth score2 (better)0
Performance score2 (better)0
Health score24 (better)
Dividend score4 (better)0
Valuation
P/E6.8×–
P/S0.7×–
EV/EBITDA4.4×–
P/FCF11.6×–
FCF yield8.6%–
Fair value$98.71–
Margin of safety60.3%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)11.2% (better)−11.6%
Revenue growth, 5Y average6.7%12.3% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)33.3%–
EPS growth, 5Y average–−11.3%
Profitability
Gross margin21.9% (better)15.1%
Operating margin–4.5%
Net margin10.7% (better)2.7%
FCF margin6.2% (better)−2.2%
Return on equity–3.6%
Return on invested capital–2.8%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.20
Net debt / EBITDA0.17 (better)0.59
Interest coverage–3.3×
Current ratio2.312.49 (better)
Altman Z-score1.59–
Piotroski F-score6 (better)5
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield1.0%–
Payout ratio6.9%–
Years of dividend growth0–
Shareholder yield1.0%–
Ownership
Held by institutions77.9%1.4%
Held by insiders0.45%0.00%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$1.3M–
Superinvestors holding2 (better)1
Short interest, % of float4.5%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.