Air Water Ventures Ltd (WATR) stock
Close on Nov 13, 2026Market cap –P/E –Yield –
Key statistics
Valuation at the latest close; fundamentals over fiscal
Valuation
- Market cap
- –
- P/E ratio
- –
- Price to sales
- –
- Price to book
- –
- Dividend yield
- –
- Free cash flow yield
- –
Trading
- Previous close
- $1.60
- Open
- $1.56
- Day's range
- $1.45 – $1.56
- Volume
- 5,088
- Average volume (20 days)
- 32,442
Total return vs. the S&P 500
Price change plus reinvested dividends, to the close on Nov 13, 2026. The S&P 500 is measured by the SPY fund.
| Period | WATR | S&P 500 | Difference | WATR per year | S&P 500 per year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | -22.5% | -3.0% | −19.4 pts | ||
| 3 months | -61.9% | -2.8% | −59.2 pts | ||
| Year to date | -85.7% | +11.5% | −97.2 pts | ||
| 1 year | -85.8% | +13.5% | −99.2 pts |
Press releases
Releases Air Water Ventures filed with the SEC as exhibits to Form 8-K or 6-K
About Air Water Ventures
Beverages
Air Water Ventures Limited is a holding company that conducts its business primarily through Air Water Ventures Holdings Limited and its operating subsidiaries. The company specializes in the development and provision of atmospheric water generation systems and related water solutions, providing sustainable drinking and utility water sourced directly from ambient air to serve enterprise, institutional, and consumer client bases across various market sectors.
Company profile, executives and historyAir Water Ventures stock: common questions
What is Air Water Ventures's stock price?
WATR closed at $1.45 on Nov 13, 2026, down 9.38% on the day.
Does Air Water Ventures pay a dividend?
No. Air Water Ventures has not paid a cash dividend over the last twelve months.
How has WATR stock performed over the past year?
Including dividends, WATR returned -85.8% over the past year, against +13.5% for the S&P 500.
Who are Air Water Ventures's competitors?
Companies most similar to Air Water Ventures by business, industry and size include PRMB, RAKR, COCO, MOJO, IBG.
See a number that looks wrong?