Swarmer, Inc (SWMR) stock
Close on Nov 12, 2026Market cap $104.09MP/E –Yield –
Key statistics
Valuation at the latest close; fundamentals over fiscal , balances at Jun 30, 2026
Valuation
- Market cap
- $104.09M
- P/E ratio
- –
- Price to sales
- –
- Price to book
- 3.33
- Dividend yield
- –
- Free cash flow yield
- –
Fundamentals
- Book value per share
- $1.91
- Diluted shares
- 16M
Trading
- Previous close
- $9.43
- Open
- $9.15
- Day's range
- $8.63 – $9.50
- Volume
- 307,979
- Average volume (20 days)
- 522,828
- Index membership
- Russell 2000 (since Jun 2026)
- RSI (14 days)
- 38.6
- Volatility (1 year)
- 191.8%
- Relative volume
- 0.53×
Index membership is inferred from the holdings of funds that track each index (IWM), as reported to the SEC for Jun 30, 2026. Join dates come from quarterly fund reports since 2019, so they are accurate to the quarter.
Total return vs. the S&P 500
Price change plus reinvested dividends, to the close on Nov 12, 2026. The S&P 500 is measured by the SPY fund.
| Period | SWMR | S&P 500 | Difference | SWMR per year | S&P 500 per year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | -28.0% | -2.7% | −25.3 pts | ||
| 3 months | -78.0% | -1.7% | −76.2 pts |
Two years at a glance
Fiscal years 2024 to 2025, USD
Press releases
Releases Swarmer filed with the SEC as exhibits to Form 8-K or 6-K
- Results
- Update
- Results
- News
- Results
- News
Swarmer stock: common questions
What is Swarmer's stock price?
SWMR closed at $8.73 on Nov 12, 2026, down 7.42% on the day.
What is Swarmer's market cap?
Swarmer was worth $104.09M at the close on Nov 12, 2026: the share price times the diluted shares outstanding.
Does Swarmer pay a dividend?
No. Swarmer has not paid a cash dividend over the last twelve months.
How many SWMR shares are sold short?
1M shares were sold short at the latest FINRA report, 135.76% of the float, or 2.0 days of average trading volume.
Who are Swarmer's competitors?
Companies most similar to Swarmer by business, industry and size include MSFT, PLTR, ORCL, SAP, CRWD.
See a number that looks wrong?