Ubiquiti vs Vistance Networks
UI and VISN side by side, both in communications equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How UI and VISN compare
Ubiquiti is the larger company, worth 44 times as much as Vistance Networks ($41.1B against $936M).
On earnings, Vistance Networks is cheaper: it trades at 0.1× trailing earnings, against 38.4× for Ubiquiti.
Ubiquiti grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (29.4% versus 10.9% for Vistance Networks).
Vistance Networks keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 504% compared with 30.1% at Ubiquiti.
Both pay dividends: Ubiquiti yields 0.50% and Vistance Networks 406%.
Ubiquiti scores higher on the StockData Score (21 against 15 for Vistance Networks), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | UI | VISN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $41.1B | $936M |
| Share price | $679.42 | $4.06 |
| Change, 1 year | 15.3% | −75.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 129% | −58.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.16 | 1.74 |
| Employees | 1,321 | 4,500 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 21 (better) | 15 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 38.4× | 0.1× (better) |
| P/S | 11.5× | 0.6× (better) |
| P/B | 24.4× | 0.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 30.2× | 1.5× (better) |
| P/FCF | 40.0× | – |
| PEG | 1.16 | – |
| FCF yield | 2.5% (better) | −11.3% |
| Fair value | $562.80 | $19.06 |
| Margin of safety | −20.7% | 78.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 29.4% (better) | 10.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 11.5% (better) | −25.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 35.5% | 780% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 35.5% | 956% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 10.1% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 46.5% (better) | 42.6% |
| Operating margin | 36.9% (better) | 2.1% |
| Net margin | 30.1% | 504% (better) |
| FCF margin | 28.8% (better) | −6.5% |
| Return on equity | 85.4% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 131% (better) | 1.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −4.05 |
| Current ratio | 3.13 | 4.00 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 35.02 (better) | 2.16 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.50% | 406% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 19.2% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 14.9% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.50% | 406% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 4.9% | 100% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 26.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$340K (better) | −$1.2M |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.57% | 23.1% |
Go deeper
- UI stock overview
- UI income statement
- UI valuation and score
- VISN stock overview
- VISN income statement
- VISN valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.