Turning Point Brands vs Tootsie Roll Industries
TPB and TR side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How TPB and TR compare
Tootsie Roll Industries is the larger company, worth 2.5 times as much as Turning Point Brands ($2.9B against $1.2B).
On earnings, Tootsie Roll Industries is cheaper: it trades at 33.3× trailing earnings, against 42.3× for Turning Point Brands.
Turning Point Brands grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (23.8% versus 0.20% for Tootsie Roll Industries).
Tootsie Roll Industries keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.4% compared with 5.1% at Turning Point Brands.
Both pay dividends: Turning Point Brands yields 0.54% and Tootsie Roll Industries 0.92%.
Tootsie Roll Industries scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 11 for Turning Point Brands), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | TPB | TR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.2B | $2.9B |
| Share price | $58.81 | $38.60 |
| Change, 1 year | −42.1% | 4.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 57.2% | 39.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.66 | 0.27 |
| Employees | 484 | 2,100 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 42.3× | 33.3× (better) |
| P/S | 2.2× (better) | 4.0× |
| P/B | – | 3.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | 21.2× (better) | 27.8× |
| P/FCF | 49.4× (better) | 53.8× |
| PEG | 0.61 | – |
| FCF yield | 2.0% (better) | 1.9% |
| Fair value | $34.31 | $26.06 |
| Margin of safety | −71.4% | −48.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 23.8% (better) | 0.20% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.7% | 9.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −47.7% | −11.5% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −51.1% | −7.9% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 10.9% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 58.4% (better) | 33.8% |
| Operating margin | 10.9% (better) | 10.9% |
| Net margin | 5.1% | 11.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | 4.4% | 7.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 8.9% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 7.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.73 | – |
| Interest coverage | 2.3× | – |
| Current ratio | 5.83 (better) | 2.67 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.56 | 6.26 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.54% | 0.92% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 22.8% | 32.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.54% | 0.92% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 100% | 17.1% |
| Held by insiders | 6.7% | 59.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$4.1M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 17.8% | – |
Go deeper
- TPB stock overview
- TPB income statement
- TPB valuation and score
- TR stock overview
- TR income statement
- TR valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.