StockData

Tidewater vs Viking

TDW and VIK side by side, both in water transportation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How TDW and VIK compare

Viking grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.0% versus 0.34% for Tidewater).

Tidewater keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 19.4% compared with 19.3% at Viking.

Tidewater scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 6 for Viking), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricTDWVIK
Size and price
Market cap$3.9B–
Share price$77.86$88.88
Change, 1 year32.1%48.0%
Change, 5 years589%–
Beta (5Y)0.911.17
Employees7,30013K
StockData Score
Total score9 (better)6
Valuation score2 (better)0
Growth score13 (better)
Performance score4 (better)2
Health score2 (better)1
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E14.7×–
P/S2.8×–
P/B2.8×–
EV/EBITDA9.6×–
P/FCF14.3×–
FCF yield7.0%–
Fair value$73.22–
Margin of safety−6.3%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)0.34%20.0% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average27.8%–
Net income growth (TTM)74.8% (better)64.8%
EPS growth (TTM)78.5%–
Profitability
Gross margin–43.2%
Operating margin17.3%23.3% (better)
Net margin19.4% (better)19.3%
FCF margin19.8%–
Return on equity20.8%–
Return on invested capital14.5%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.61–
Net debt / EBITDA1.041.01 (better)
Interest coverage–4.6×
Current ratio2.23 (better)0.81
Altman Z-score2.68–
Piotroski F-score78 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield0.21%–
Shareholder yield0.21%–
Ownership
Held by institutions115%47.7%
Held by insiders7.0%53.8%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$10.5M (better)−$43.7M
Superinvestors holding1–
Short interest, % of float–4.7%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.