Shenandoah Telecommunications vs Uniti
SHEN and UNIT side by side, both in telephone communications. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How SHEN and UNIT compare
Uniti is the larger company, worth 1.7 times as much as Shenandoah Telecommunications ($988M against $575M).
Uniti grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (127% versus 5.5% for Shenandoah Telecommunications).
Shenandoah Telecommunications keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −10.2% compared with −21.2% at Uniti.
Shenandoah Telecommunications pays a dividend yielding 1.2%; Uniti does not pay one.
Shenandoah Telecommunications scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 6 for Uniti), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | SHEN | UNIT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $575M | $988M |
| Share price | $10.39 | $4.07 |
| Change, 1 year | −5.7% | −37.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −61.4% | −70.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.68 | 1.21 |
| Employees | 1,041 | 8,632 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 1.5× | 0.3× (better) |
| P/B | 0.7× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.3× | 8.7× (better) |
| FCF yield | −37.7% | – |
| Fair value | $13.66 | $15.75 |
| Margin of safety | 23.9% | 74.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.5% | 127% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.1% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −148% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −155% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 65.1% | – |
| Operating margin | −3.9% | 3.1% (better) |
| Net margin | −10.2% (better) | −21.2% |
| FCF margin | −58.5% | – |
| Return on equity | −4.4% (better) | −258% |
| Return on invested capital | −0.76% | 1.7% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.88 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 6.29 (better) | 7.97 |
| Interest coverage | −0.4× | 0.1× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.71 | 1.33 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.92 (better) | 0.38 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.2% (better) | 0.00% |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −20.2% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 1.2% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 71.6% | 93.1% |
| Held by insiders | 24.7% | 30.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $94.1K (better) | −$58.6K |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.4% | 14.2% |
Go deeper
- SHEN stock overview
- SHEN income statement
- SHEN valuation and score
- UNIT stock overview
- UNIT income statement
- UNIT valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.