SandRidge Energy vs Vitesse Energy
SD and VTS side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How SD and VTS compare
Vitesse Energy is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as SandRidge Energy ($641M against $482M).
SandRidge Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (24.9% versus 10.6% for Vitesse Energy).
SandRidge Energy keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 50.1% compared with −15.4% at Vitesse Energy.
Both pay dividends: SandRidge Energy yields 5.4% and Vitesse Energy 12.3%.
SandRidge Energy scores higher on the StockData Score (22 against 10 for Vitesse Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | SD | VTS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $482M | $641M |
| Share price | $12.99 | $15.23 |
| Change, 1 year | 1.2% | −28.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 10.8% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.62 | 0.68 |
| Employees | 102 | 37 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 22 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 5.0× | – |
| P/S | 2.5× | 2.1× (better) |
| P/B | 0.8× (better) | 1.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.3× (better) | 17.7× |
| P/FCF | 10.2× | – |
| FCF yield | 9.8% | – |
| Fair value | $19.50 | $19.32 |
| Margin of safety | 33.4% (better) | 21.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 24.9% (better) | 10.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.3% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 47.6% (better) | −322% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 47.2% (better) | −337% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 38.4% (better) | 12.0% |
| Net margin | 50.1% (better) | −15.4% |
| FCF margin | 24.2% | – |
| Return on equity | 18.4% (better) | −7.6% |
| Return on invested capital | 16.8% (better) | 4.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | 3.2× |
| Current ratio | 1.52 (better) | 0.65 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.93 (better) | 1.40 |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 5.4% | 12.3% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 23.3% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 2 |
| Buyback yield | 0.01% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 5.4% | 12.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 81.7% | 66.2% |
| Held by insiders | 14.7% | 19.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$7.3M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.1% | 17.1% |
Go deeper
- SD stock overview
- SD income statement
- SD valuation and score
- VTS stock overview
- VTS income statement
- VTS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.