Rapid7 vs SentinelOne
RPD and S side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How RPD and S compare
SentinelOne is the larger company, worth 8.0 times as much as Rapid7 ($7.7B against $971M).
SentinelOne grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (21.1% versus −0.97% for Rapid7).
Rapid7 keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 1.6% compared with −31.0% at SentinelOne.
SentinelOne scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 5 for Rapid7), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | RPD | S |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $971M | $7.7B |
| Share price | $14.41 | $22.20 |
| Change, 1 year | 2.9% | 29.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −89.1% | −68.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.55 | 1.64 |
| Employees | 2,613 | 2,900 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 9 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 68.6× | – |
| P/S | 1.1× (better) | 7.0× |
| P/B | 4.4× (better) | 5.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.1× | – |
| P/FCF | 6.9× (better) | 137× |
| FCF yield | 14.4% (better) | 0.73% |
| Fair value | $15.76 | $16.73 |
| Margin of safety | 8.6% (better) | −32.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −0.97% | 21.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 15.9% | 60.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −38.3% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −38.2% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 69.1% | 72.5% (better) |
| Operating margin | 1.6% (better) | −29.5% |
| Net margin | 1.6% (better) | −31.0% |
| FCF margin | 16.5% (better) | 5.1% |
| Return on equity | 8.0% (better) | −23.0% |
| Return on invested capital | – | −34.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | 1.3× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.83 | 1.45 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −0.00 | 3.82 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 103% | 82.6% |
| Held by insiders | 14.7% | 6.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$23.2K (better) | −$42.5M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.9% | 10.4% |
Go deeper
- RPD stock overview
- RPD income statement
- RPD valuation and score
- S stock overview
- S income statement
- S valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.