StockData

Rambus vs Silicon Motion Technology

RMBS and SIMO side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How RMBS and SIMO compare

Rambus grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (17.3% versus 10.2% for Silicon Motion Technology).

Rambus keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 33.4% compared with 13.8% at Silicon Motion Technology.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricRMBSSIMO
Size and price
Market cap$9.1B–
Share price$85.36$183.65
Change, 1 year−22.8%94.4%
Change, 5 years213%163%
Beta (5Y)1.751.21
Employees7912,009
StockData Score
Total score1212
Valuation score3 (better)0
Growth score22
Performance score45 (better)
Health score35 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E35.1×–
P/S11.5×–
P/B6.4×–
EV/EBITDA27.8×–
P/FCF29.2×–
FCF yield3.4%–
Fair value$85.65–
Margin of safety0.34%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)17.3% (better)10.2%
Revenue growth, 5Y average23.5% (better)10.4%
Net income growth (TTM)16.2%37.4% (better)
EPS growth (TTM)15.7%37.9% (better)
EPS growth, 5Y average–9.8%
Profitability
Gross margin79.1% (better)48.3%
Operating margin36.3% (better)10.5%
Net margin33.4% (better)13.8%
FCF margin39.3% (better)0.71%
Return on equity19.6% (better)15.3%
Return on invested capital38.7% (better)14.5%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.00
Interest coverage245×–
Current ratio9.38 (better)2.78
Altman Z-score41.14–
Piotroski F-score67 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Payout ratio–54.8%
Years of dividend growth–0
Dividend growth, 5Y average–7.4%
Buyback yield1.5%–
Shareholder yield1.5%–
Ownership
Held by institutions94.0%18.6%
Held by insiders0.78%0.84%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$20.0M−$1.9M (better)
Superinvestors holding1–
Short interest, % of float4.2%–

Go deeper

Other comparisons

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.