Riley Exploration Permian vs TETRA Technologies
REPX and TTI side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How REPX and TTI compare
Riley Exploration Permian and TETRA Technologies are about the same size, with market caps of $949M and $928M.
On earnings, Riley Exploration Permian is cheaper: it trades at 9.2× trailing earnings, against 105× for TETRA Technologies.
Riley Exploration Permian grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (45.5% versus 6.1% for TETRA Technologies).
Riley Exploration Permian keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 17.3% compared with 1.4% at TETRA Technologies.
Riley Exploration Permian pays a dividend yielding 2.8%; TETRA Technologies does not pay one.
Riley Exploration Permian scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 2 for TETRA Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | REPX | TTI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $949M | $928M |
| Share price | $42.83 | $6.27 |
| Change, 1 year | 72.4% | −22.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 108% | 119% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.08 | 1.16 |
| Employees | 122 | 1,400 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 9.2× (better) | 105× |
| P/S | 1.6× | 1.4× (better) |
| P/B | 1.5× (better) | 2.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.1× (better) | 11.9× |
| FCF yield | – | −4.6% |
| Fair value | $58.41 | $2.93 |
| Margin of safety | 26.7% (better) | −114% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 45.5% (better) | 6.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 142% (better) | 10.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 15.7% (better) | −92.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 13.4% (better) | −93.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 22.5% |
| Operating margin | 45.6% (better) | 6.9% |
| Net margin | 17.3% (better) | 1.4% |
| FCF margin | – | −6.4% |
| Return on equity | 16.8% (better) | 2.5% |
| Return on invested capital | 23.2% (better) | 5.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.38 (better) | 0.44 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.57 (better) | 0.70 |
| Interest coverage | 9.5× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.41 | 2.43 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.09 | 2.51 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.8% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.8% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 69.8% | 91.9% |
| Held by insiders | 44.1% | 15.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$71.9M | −$255K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 9.4% | 8.7% |
Go deeper
- REPX stock overview
- REPX income statement
- REPX valuation and score
- TTI stock overview
- TTI income statement
- TTI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.