Riley Exploration Permian vs SandRidge Energy
REPX and SD side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How REPX and SD compare
Riley Exploration Permian is the larger company, worth 2.0 times as much as SandRidge Energy ($949M against $482M).
On earnings, SandRidge Energy is cheaper: it trades at 5.0× trailing earnings, against 9.2× for Riley Exploration Permian.
Riley Exploration Permian grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (45.5% versus 24.9% for SandRidge Energy).
SandRidge Energy keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 50.1% compared with 17.3% at Riley Exploration Permian.
Both pay dividends: Riley Exploration Permian yields 2.8% and SandRidge Energy 5.4%.
SandRidge Energy scores higher on the StockData Score (22 against 15 for Riley Exploration Permian), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | REPX | SD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $949M | $482M |
| Share price | $42.83 | $12.99 |
| Change, 1 year | 72.4% | 1.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 108% | 10.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.08 | 0.62 |
| Employees | 122 | 102 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 | 22 (better) |
| Valuation score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 4 | 4 |
| Health score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 9.2× | 5.0× (better) |
| P/S | 1.6× (better) | 2.5× |
| P/B | 1.5× | 0.8× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.1× (better) | 3.3× |
| P/FCF | – | 10.2× |
| FCF yield | – | 9.8% |
| Fair value | $58.41 | $19.50 |
| Margin of safety | 26.7% | 33.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 45.5% (better) | 24.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 142% (better) | 6.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 15.7% | 47.6% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 13.4% | 47.2% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 45.6% (better) | 38.4% |
| Net margin | 17.3% | 50.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | – | 24.2% |
| Return on equity | 16.8% | 18.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 23.2% (better) | 16.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.38 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.57 | – |
| Interest coverage | 9.5× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.41 | 1.52 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.09 (better) | 1.93 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.8% | 5.4% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 23.3% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.01% |
| Shareholder yield | 2.8% | 5.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 69.8% | 81.7% |
| Held by insiders | 44.1% | 14.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$71.9M | – |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 9.4% | 5.1% |
Go deeper
- REPX stock overview
- REPX income statement
- REPX valuation and score
- SD stock overview
- SD income statement
- SD valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.