StockData

Pattern vs QVC

PTRN and QVCG side by side, both in nonstore retailers. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How PTRN and QVCG compare

Pattern is the larger company, worth 453056391 times as much as QVC ($3.6B against $8).

Pattern grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (42.1% versus −8.1% for QVC).

Pattern keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.6% compared with −0.21% at QVC.

Pattern scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 7 for QVC), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricPTRNQVCG
Size and price
Market cap$3.6B$8
Share price$20.38$7.98
Change, 1 year12.0%–
Beta (5Y)1.73–
Employees2,30015K
StockData Score
Total score12 (better)7
Valuation score03 (better)
Growth score3 (better)0
Performance score3 (better)2
Health score6 (better)2
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S1.1×0.0× (better)
P/B5.5×–
EV/EBITDA20.7× (better)−2.2×
P/FCF34.1×–
FCF yield2.9%–
Fair value$16.30$10792300000.00
Margin of safety−25.0%100% (better)
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)42.1% (better)−8.1%
Revenue growth, 5Y average–−6.3%
Net income growth (TTM)1952%–
Profitability
Gross margin43.7% (better)33.3%
Operating margin4.3%4.3% (better)
Net margin3.6% (better)−0.21%
FCF margin3.2%–
Return on equity19.6% (better)−6.3%
Return on invested capital40.8% (better)12.7%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00–
Net debt / EBITDA–−2.27
Current ratio2.323.21 (better)
Altman Z-score8.83 (better)−0.33
Piotroski F-score7 (better)4
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield0.61%–
Shareholder yield0.61% (better)0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions36.4%–
Held by insiders74.0%–
Insider net buying, 12 months−$167M$15.8M (better)
Short interest, % of float16.9%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.