Public Storage vs Weyerhaeuser
PSA and WY side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PSA and WY compare
Public Storage is the larger company, worth 4.1 times as much as Weyerhaeuser ($62.1B against $15.0B).
On earnings, Weyerhaeuser is cheaper: it trades at 33.0× trailing earnings, against 34.8× for Public Storage.
Public Storage grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.2% versus −1.1% for Weyerhaeuser).
Public Storage keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 37.8% compared with 6.5% at Weyerhaeuser.
Both pay dividends: Public Storage yields 3.6% and Weyerhaeuser 4.0%.
Public Storage scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 7 for Weyerhaeuser), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PSA | WY |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $62.1B | $15.0B |
| Share price | $332.59 | $20.81 |
| Change, 1 year | 20.9% | −7.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 0.26% | −45.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.72 | 0.77 |
| Employees | 5,770 | 9,517 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 34.8× | 33.0× (better) |
| P/S | 12.3× | 2.1× (better) |
| P/B | 4.3× | 1.6× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 17.7× | 15.0× (better) |
| Fair value | $242.52 | $17.12 |
| Margin of safety | −37.1% | −21.5% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.2% (better) | −1.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.6% (better) | −1.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 0.44% | 36.9% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −0.83% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 7.5% (better) | −15.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 15.0% |
| Operating margin | – | 11.7% |
| Net margin | 37.8% (better) | 6.5% |
| Return on equity | 16.0% (better) | 4.8% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 5.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.01 (better) | 0.57 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.10 | 3.75 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 3.1× |
| Current ratio | – | 1.82 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.80 (better) | 2.04 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.6% | 4.0% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 134% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 8.4% | 10.5% (better) |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.27% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.6% | 4.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 81.8% | 97.4% |
| Held by insiders | 9.4% | 0.40% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$772K (better) | −$1.7M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.2% | 4.8% |
Go deeper
- PSA stock overview
- PSA income statement
- PSA valuation and score
- WY stock overview
- WY income statement
- WY valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.