Purple Innovation vs Somnigroup International
PRPL and SGI side by side, both in consumer discretionary. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PRPL and SGI compare
Somnigroup International is the larger company, worth 1873 times as much as Purple Innovation ($13.1B against $7.0M).
Somnigroup International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (15.1% versus −5.6% for Purple Innovation).
Somnigroup International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.6% compared with −8.9% at Purple Innovation.
Somnigroup International pays a dividend yielding 1.1%; Purple Innovation does not pay one.
Somnigroup International scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 2 for Purple Innovation), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PRPL | SGI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $7.0M | $13.1B |
| Share price | $1.61 | $62.49 |
| Change, 1 year | −91.6% | −33.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −99.5% | 42.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.50 | 1.21 |
| Employees | 1,100 | 19K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 2 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 25.9× |
| P/S | 0.0× (better) | 1.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 14.3× |
| P/FCF | – | 18.8× |
| FCF yield | −33.9% | 5.3% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $44.07 |
| Margin of safety | – | −41.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −5.6% | 15.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −6.3% | 15.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 64.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 57.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 2.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 38.4% | 43.4% (better) |
| Operating margin | −7.7% | 11.9% (better) |
| Net margin | −8.9% | 6.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | −0.55% | 8.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 3.81 |
| Interest coverage | −1.0× | 3.8× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.47 | 1.23 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −2.98 | 1.50 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.1% |
| Payout ratio | – | 26.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 4 |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.20% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 1.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 56.9% | 107% |
| Held by insiders | – | 3.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $29.4K | $4.4M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 3 |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 9.4% |
Go deeper
- PRPL stock overview
- PRPL income statement
- PRPL valuation and score
- SGI stock overview
- SGI income statement
- SGI valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.