Primoris Services vs Sterling Infrastructure
PRIM and STRL side by side, both in heavy construction other than building construction contractors. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PRIM and STRL compare
Sterling Infrastructure is the larger company, worth 2.4 times as much as Primoris Services ($9.3B against $3.9B).
On earnings, Sterling Infrastructure is cheaper: it trades at 17.1× trailing earnings, against 40.8× for Primoris Services.
Sterling Infrastructure grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (93.1% versus −5.4% for Primoris Services).
Sterling Infrastructure keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 12.9% compared with 1.4% at Primoris Services.
Primoris Services pays a dividend yielding 0.44%; Sterling Infrastructure does not pay one.
Sterling Infrastructure scores higher on the StockData Score (22 against 9 for Primoris Services), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PRIM | STRL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.9B | $9.3B |
| Share price | $72.22 | $303.85 |
| Change, 1 year | −44.0% | −21.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 187% | 959% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.28 | 1.48 |
| Employees | 3,055 | 4,400 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 22 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 40.8× | 17.1× (better) |
| P/S | 0.6× (better) | 2.1× |
| P/B | 2.5× (better) | 6.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.8× | 10.4× (better) |
| P/FCF | 103× | 19.7× (better) |
| PEG | 1.53 | 0.44 (better) |
| FCF yield | 0.97% | 5.1% (better) |
| Fair value | $48.52 | $404.83 |
| Margin of safety | −48.8% | 24.9% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −5.4% | 93.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 16.8% (better) | 15.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −65.2% | 75.5% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −65.1% | 74.5% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 18.4% | 44.3% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 8.5% | 23.8% (better) |
| Operating margin | 2.4% | 18.2% (better) |
| Net margin | 1.4% | 12.9% (better) |
| FCF margin | 0.53% | 10.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | 6.0% | 43.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 6.3% | 51.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.50 | 0.06 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.05 (better) | −0.14 |
| Current ratio | 1.14 (better) | 1.04 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.90 | 5.43 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.44% | – |
| Payout ratio | 18.1% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 2 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 5.9% | – |
| Buyback yield | – | 1.4% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.44% | 1.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 102% | 86.3% |
| Held by insiders | 1.1% | 2.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$6.5M (better) | −$96.3M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.8% | 4.7% |
Go deeper
- PRIM stock overview
- PRIM income statement
- PRIM valuation and score
- STRL stock overview
- STRL income statement
- STRL valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.