Pilgrims Pride vs Seaboard
PPC and SEB side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PPC and SEB compare
Pilgrims Pride is the larger company, worth 1.9 times as much as Seaboard ($6.7B against $3.6B).
On earnings, Seaboard is cheaper: it trades at 5.7× trailing earnings, against 20.9× for Pilgrims Pride.
Seaboard grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.2% versus −0.12% for Pilgrims Pride).
Seaboard pays a dividend yielding 0.18%; Pilgrims Pride does not pay one.
Seaboard scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 9 for Pilgrims Pride), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PPC | SEB |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $6.7B | $3.6B |
| Share price | $28.21 | $3749.49 |
| Change, 1 year | −24.8% | −1.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −1.4% | −4.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.35 | 0.25 |
| Employees | 63K | 14K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 20.9× | 5.7× (better) |
| P/S | 0.4× | 0.3× (better) |
| P/B | 1.7× | 0.7× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.3× | 5.0× (better) |
| P/FCF | 14.4× | – |
| PEG | 1.54 (better) | 5.79 |
| FCF yield | 6.9% (better) | −0.64% |
| Fair value | $33.89 | $7958.66 |
| Margin of safety | 16.8% | 52.9% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −0.12% | 8.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.9% (better) | 6.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −74.0% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −73.8% | 362% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 63.4% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 7.9% | 8.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | 3.4% (better) | 3.4% |
| Net margin | 1.7% | – |
| FCF margin | 2.5% (better) | −0.22% |
| Return on equity | 8.6% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 6.6% | 6.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.88 | 0.18 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.22 (better) | −0.35 |
| Interest coverage | 3.9× | 4.8× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.55 | 2.40 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.93 | 3.26 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.18% (better) |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 0.00% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.18% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 20.6% | 26.1% |
| Held by insiders | 82.3% | 0.00% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$303K | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 13.8% | 1.9% |
Go deeper
- PPC stock overview
- PPC income statement
- PPC valuation and score
- SEB stock overview
- SEB income statement
- SEB valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.