Palantir Technologies vs SS&C Technologies
PLTR and SSNC side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PLTR and SSNC compare
Palantir Technologies is the larger company, worth 22 times as much as SS&C Technologies ($414B against $18.6B).
On earnings, SS&C Technologies is cheaper: it trades at 22.9× trailing earnings, against 121× for Palantir Technologies.
Palantir Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (87.1% versus 8.7% for SS&C Technologies).
Palantir Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 50.3% compared with 12.8% at SS&C Technologies.
SS&C Technologies pays a dividend yielding 1.4%; Palantir Technologies does not pay one.
SS&C Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 14 for Palantir Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PLTR | SSNC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $414B | $18.6B |
| Share price | $172.40 | $79.44 |
| Change, 1 year | −11.0% | −6.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 705% | −0.86% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.20 | 0.94 |
| Employees | 4,429 | 29K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 121× | 22.9× (better) |
| P/S | 56.8× | 2.8× (better) |
| P/B | 36.9× | 2.8× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 120× | 11.0× (better) |
| P/FCF | 102× | 10.3× (better) |
| PEG | – | 2.76 |
| FCF yield | 0.98% | 9.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $48.62 | $96.45 |
| Margin of safety | −255% | 17.6% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 87.1% (better) | 8.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 32.6% (better) | 6.1% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 235% (better) | 0.11% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 240% (better) | 3.3% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 6.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 84.7% (better) | 48.2% |
| Operating margin | 45.6% (better) | 23.8% |
| Net margin | 50.3% (better) | 12.8% |
| FCF margin | 55.6% (better) | 27.1% |
| Return on equity | 41.2% (better) | 12.5% |
| Return on invested capital | 801% (better) | 9.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 1.11 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 2.98 |
| Interest coverage | – | 3.6× |
| Current ratio | 7.10 (better) | 1.09 |
| Altman Z-score | 122.50 (better) | 1.75 |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.4% |
| Payout ratio | – | 31.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 3 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 14.4% |
| Buyback yield | – | 5.8% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 7.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 60.3% | 86.3% |
| Held by insiders | 7.6% | 15.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$710M | −$584K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.5% | 2.3% |
Go deeper
- PLTR stock overview
- PLTR income statement
- PLTR valuation and score
- SSNC stock overview
- SSNC income statement
- SSNC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.