Payoneer Global vs Priority Technology
PAYO and PRTH side by side, both in miscellaneous business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PAYO and PRTH compare
Payoneer Global is the larger company, worth 3.7 times as much as Priority Technology ($2.4B against $651M).
On earnings, Priority Technology is cheaper: it trades at 16.1× trailing earnings, against 48.0× for Payoneer Global.
Priority Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.1% versus 4.6% for Payoneer Global).
Payoneer Global scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 9 for Priority Technology), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PAYO | PRTH |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.4B | $651M |
| Share price | $7.20 | $7.90 |
| Change, 1 year | 25.2% | 36.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −16.3% | 28.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.17 | 1.01 |
| Employees | 2,540 | 1,200 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 48.0× | 16.1× (better) |
| P/S | 2.2× | 0.6× (better) |
| P/B | 3.7× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.4× | 7.4× (better) |
| P/FCF | 12.1× | 6.0× (better) |
| FCF yield | 8.3% | 16.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $5.73 | $13.84 |
| Margin of safety | −25.7% | 42.9% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.6% | 10.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 25.0% (better) | 18.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −29.4% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −16.7% | −7.5% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 12.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 39.1% |
| Operating margin | 9.3% | 13.2% (better) |
| Net margin | 4.7% | – |
| FCF margin | 18.6% (better) | 10.6% |
| Return on equity | 7.2% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 19.1% (better) | 12.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 4.30 |
| Interest coverage | – | 1.6× |
| Current ratio | 1.02 | 1.10 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.40 | 0.74 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 7.0% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 7.0% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 89.5% | 23.6% |
| Held by insiders | 21.0% | 59.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$175K | −$23.8K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.2% | – |
Go deeper
- PAYO stock overview
- PAYO income statement
- PAYO valuation and score
- PRTH stock overview
- PRTH income statement
- PRTH valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.