Paycom Software vs Procore Technologies
PAYC and PCOR side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PAYC and PCOR compare
Paycom Software and Procore Technologies are about the same size, with market caps of $11.2B and $11.8B.
Procore Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (16.5% versus 9.5% for Paycom Software).
Paycom Software keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 23.3% compared with −2.3% at Procore Technologies.
Paycom Software pays a dividend yielding 0.60%; Procore Technologies does not pay one.
Paycom Software scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 11 for Procore Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PAYC | PCOR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $11.2B | $11.8B |
| Share price | $248.86 | $77.62 |
| Change, 1 year | 48.4% | −0.58% |
| Change, 5 years | −47.1% | −12.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.27 | 1.47 |
| Employees | 5,770 | 4,421 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 20 (better) | 11 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 23.9× | – |
| P/S | 5.1× (better) | 7.9× |
| P/B | 15.9× | 10.9× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.3× (better) | 188× |
| P/FCF | 17.0× (better) | 33.2× |
| PEG | 1.28 | – |
| FCF yield | 5.9% (better) | 3.0% |
| Fair value | $327.43 | $10.68 |
| Margin of safety | 24.0% (better) | −627% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 9.5% | 16.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 19.5% | 27.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 12.6% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 29.6% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 26.9% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 84.0% (better) | 80.1% |
| Operating margin | 33.4% (better) | −4.1% |
| Net margin | 23.3% (better) | −2.3% |
| FCF margin | 30.1% (better) | 23.9% |
| Return on equity | 42.2% (better) | −3.0% |
| Return on invested capital | 40.1% (better) | −9.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.06 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.63 | – |
| Interest coverage | 27.2× (better) | −10.8× |
| Current ratio | 1.06 (better) | 1.06 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.65 | 3.39 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.60% | – |
| Payout ratio | 14.3% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Buyback yield | 13.4% (better) | 2.3% |
| Shareholder yield | 14.0% (better) | 2.3% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 92.0% | 101% |
| Held by insiders | 15.8% | 14.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.6M (better) | −$57.3M |
| Superinvestors holding | 3 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.2% | 14.6% |
Go deeper
- PAYC stock overview
- PAYC income statement
- PAYC valuation and score
- PCOR stock overview
- PCOR income statement
- PCOR valuation and score
Other comparisons
- APPF vs PCOR
- BSY vs PCOR
- FIG vs PCOR
- GWRE vs PCOR
- IOT vs PCOR
- MANH vs PCOR
- PAYC vs PCTY
- PAYC vs TYL
- PCOR vs PCTY
- PCOR vs TTAN
- PCOR vs U
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.